You can’t defend a decision you can’t trace.
Existing tools ask a binary question and hand back an answer with no traceable reasoning. When an editor, an auditor or a regulator asks why, a black box has nothing to show.
Verdicts with no receipts
A score with no traceable reasoning is just an opinion. You can't reproduce it, cite it, or stand behind it.
Sources treated as equal
Most tools flatten a Tier 1 authority and an anonymous blog into the same signal. Origin credibility gets lost.
Nothing to hand an auditor
When the decision is challenged, you need an evidence report — not a screenshot of a chatbot reply.
Every score is a proof chain — not a guess.
Four stages turn a piece of content into a number you can defend. Nothing is inferred in a step you cannot inspect.
Five dimensions, one number
TrustMark™ never collapses its reasoning. See how each dimension is scored and stays inspectable.
Explore TrustMark →Compliance18 frameworks, stated honestly
No aspirational checkmarks. Status is stated per framework — what ships today, what is partial, what is next.
Open the register →Use casesFor teams that defend the call
Six sectors where the decision has to hold up — to a colleague, an auditor, or a regulator.
See the sectors →