Each one scored alone, before anything is combined.
The weights ship with the score — never buried in the model.
Truth Alignment
Claim verification grounded in web search and fact-checks — extracts atomic claims and scores them against the evidence base.
Source Integrity
Per-source credibility shown alongside every verdict — domain reputation, transparency, and historical accuracy by tier.
Author Credibility
Weighs the person behind the content — historical accuracy, domain expertise, and consistency over time.
Rhetorical Neutrality
Detects emotional intensity, urgency triggers, and persuasion tactics. Misinformation is often persuasive, not false.
Visual Authenticity
Verifies images and video via reverse-image matching, manipulation probability, and metadata consistency.
Reading the number.
A score is a recommendation about how much weight to put on something — not a verdict on whether it is true.Cite it, act on it, and be able to show the reasoning if you are asked to.
Usable with the caveat attached — the dimension dragging it down is named for you.
Do not rely on it alone. The proof chain shows exactly which evidence failed.
Every step is recorded, not inferred.
The same input always produces the same explainable result. Re-run a claim next month and you can see exactly what changed, and why.
See it on a live claim →